This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Your Jan 8th, 2001 rtlanal.c:note_stores change
- From: kenner at vlsi1 dot ultra dot nyu dot edu (Richard Kenner)
- To: geoffk at geoffk dot org
- Cc: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org, rth at redhat dot com
- Date: Mon, 15 Apr 02 16:48:59 EDT
- Subject: Re: Your Jan 8th, 2001 rtlanal.c:note_stores change
> Let me rephrase: we need a mechanism to say "this register is being set
> to something that's too complicated to describe".
Isn't that what
(set (...) (unspec ...))
means?
Interesting idea. There's the issue that an UNSPEC has an index, but that's
probably not a major problem.