This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
RE: irix6.5 bootstrap failure in mips/mips.c
- From: "Billinghurst, David (CRTS)" <David dot Billinghurst at riotinto dot com>
- To: "Richard Henderson" <rth at redhat dot com>
- Cc: <gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2002 11:47:57 +1100
- Subject: RE: irix6.5 bootstrap failure in mips/mips.c
In /usr/include/sys/ucontext.h there is
#include <standards.h>
#include <sgidefs.h>
#if _SGIAPI && !defined(__SGI_NOUCONTEXT_COMPAT)
#define fpregset __fpregset
#define fp_r __fp_r
#define fp_dregs __fp_dregs
#define fp_fregs __fp_fregs
#define fp_regs __fp_regs
#define fp_csr __fp_csr
#define fp_pad __fp_pad
#define gregs __gregs
#define fpregs __fpregs
#define ucontext __ucontext
#define sigaltstack _sigaltstack
#endif
-----Original Message-----
From: Richard Henderson [mailto:rth@redhat.com]
Sent: Tuesday, 26 March 2002 9:42
To: Billinghurst, David (CRTS)
Cc: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: irix6.5 bootstrap failure in mips/mips.c
On Mon, Mar 25, 2002 at 11:47:52AM +1100, Billinghurst, David (CRTS) wrote:
> "/exd4/billingd/src/gcc/gcc/config/mips/mips.c", line 4026: error(1565):
> struct "mips_args" has no field "__fp_regs"
> ? cum->fp_regs
> ^
Now, that's odd. Can you tell where the
#define fp_regs __fp_regs
is coming from?
(This has to be merely coincidence that it's now failing. I
can't see how my patch could possibly have caused such a thing.)
r~