This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: More libiberty/demangler fallout - gdb (was: Re: Er, ...)
- From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313 at cygnus dot com>
- To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313 at cygnus dot com>, gdb at sources dot redhat dot com
- Cc: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at mvista dot com>, gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 13:46:30 -0500
- Subject: Re: More libiberty/demangler fallout - gdb (was: Re: Er, ...)
- References: <3C59819D.9020500@cygnus.com> <20020131125948.A12285@nevyn.them.org> <3C598876.9060506@cygnus.com>
> All the 's1's have been replaced by 'short'. This is because of the
> current argument on one of the gcc lists about how the demangler should
> treat symbols that may be mangled but without the leading mangling
> prefix for v3 mangling.
>
> GCC folks, can we please get this fixed?
>
>
> Ah, thanks. I think I'll read up on GCC's revert rules.
http://gcc.gnu.org/develop.html (see Patch Reversion :-)
2002-01-30 Phil Edwards <pme@gcc.gnu.org>
* cp-demangle.c (cp_demangle_type): Do not protect with
IN_LIBGCC2.
(cplus_demangle_v3): Mimic __cxa_demangle and fall back on
cp_demangle_type.
* testsuite/demangle-expected: New gnu-v3 test.
For GDB people you want to drop liberty/cp-demangle.c back to 1.15 until
this clears up.
Andrew