This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: c/4939: [cygwin] Failure of test gcc.dg/c99-intconst-1.c
- From: jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
- To: David dot Billinghurst at riotinto dot com, gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-gnats at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-prs at gcc dot gnu dot org, jsm28 at cam dot ac dot uk, nobody at gcc dot gnu dot org, zack at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 24 Nov 2001 11:00:40 -0000
- Subject: Re: c/4939: [cygwin] Failure of test gcc.dg/c99-intconst-1.c
[Get raw message]
Synopsis: [cygwin] Failure of test gcc.dg/c99-intconst-1.c
Responsible-Changed-From-To: unassigned->zack
Responsible-Changed-By: jsm28
Responsible-Changed-When: Sat Nov 24 03:00:39 2001
Responsible-Changed-Why:
The testcase failures are expected until Zack's patch is in.
The deficiencies in Cygwin's <limits.h> - if GCC needs to
use that rather than its own functional <limits.h> - are
for the Cygwin maintainers to deal with, though
fixincludes perhaps ought to fix the problems on existing
versions of Cygwin with deficient headers.
State-Changed-From-To: open->analyzed
State-Changed-By: jsm28
State-Changed-When: Sat Nov 24 03:00:39 2001
State-Changed-Why:
The testcase fails (depending on architecture). This is expected.
Zack asked me to write the testcases; having done so I added them.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2001-08/msg01411.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2001-11/msg01370.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&pr=4939&database=gcc