This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: c++/3391: The compiler gives a Segmentation Fault when debug option is passed (-g)
- To: lerdsuwa at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Subject: Re: c++/3391: The compiler gives a Segmentation Fault when debug option is passed (-g)
- From: Rafael Jesus Alcantara Perez <rafa at dedalo-ing dot com>
- Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2001 14:31:51 +0200
- Cc: desarrollo at dedalo-ing dot com, gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-prs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Organization: Dedalo Ingenieros, S.L.
- References: <20011013132325.26635.qmail@sourceware.cygnus.com>
On 13 Oct 2001 13:23:25 -0000
lerdsuwa@gcc.gnu.org wrote:
> Synopsis: The compiler gives a Segmentation Fault when debug option is
passed (-g)
>
> State-Changed-From-To: analyzed->closed
> State-Changed-By: lerdsuwa
> State-Changed-When: Sat Oct 13 06:23:24 2001
> State-Changed-Why:
> Fixed in the main trunk.
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view&pr=3391&database=gcc
I have tried the GCC from CVS using:
cvs -z9 checkout gcc
And I've found that it does the right thing (good job, believe me, I was
waiting this a long time, so *good job* again), but I have found that the
exceptions are not catched. So I have seen the version and it is 3.1:
Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-unknown-linux-gnu/3.1/specs
Configured with: /usr/src/redhat/BUILD/gcc-20011014/configure
--enable-languages=c,c++,objc,f77 --prefix=/usr --enable-shared
--enable-threads --without-cvs i386-unknown-linux-gnu
Thread model: posix
gcc version 3.1 20011014 (experimental)
Then, I tested the 3.0.2 and I have found the old behavior. So, the final
question is, will the patches, you have sent, be integrated in the 3.0.2
version? or they will exist only in the 3.1 trunk?
Thanks again.
Rafael.
--
+----------
| Rafael Jesus Alcantara Perez.<rafa@dedalo-ing.com>
| Teléfono fijo: 952 602 959
| Dedalo Ingenieros, S.L.: http://www.dedalo-ing.com/
| Usuario de Linux Registrado: #45989
+---------------------
"For every complex problem there is a solution that is concise, clear,
simple, and wrong."
(H. L. Mencken)