Re: 3.1 Linux labels-2.c Regression

[Daniel Berlin <dan at cgsoftware dot com>]

Jeffrey Oldham <oldham@codesourcery.com> writes:

> Last night's gcc 3.1 i686-pc-linux-gnu regression tests showed new
> regressions for
>
>   FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/920501-1.c,  -O0  
>   FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/labels-1.c,  -O0  
>   FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/labels-2.c,  -O0  
>   FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/labels-2.c,  -O1  
>   FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/labels-2.c,  -O2  
>   FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/labels-2.c,  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer  
>   FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/labels-2.c,  -O3 -g  
>   FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/labels-2.c,  -Os  
>
> Are you also seeing these regressions?
I would imagine these are due to Alexandre Oliva's incorrect change in
mark_jump_label yesterday.

Try reverting it and see what happens.

> Thanks,
> Jeffrey D. Oldham
> oldham@codesourcery.com

-- 
"Last night, I walked up to this beautiful woman in a bar and
asked her, "Do you live around here often?"  She said, "You're
wearing two different colored socks."  I said, "Yes, but to me
they're the same because I go by thickness."  Then she asked,
"How do you feel?"  and I said, "Well, you know when you're
sitting on a chair and you lean back so you're just on two legs
then you lean too far and you almost fall over but at the last
second you catch yourself?  I feel like that all the time."
"-Steven Wright