This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

libstdc++/4143: --disable == --enable for version-specific-runtime-libs



>Number:         4143
>Category:       libstdc++
>Synopsis:       --disable == --enable for version-specific-runtime-libs
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       non-critical
>Priority:       low
>Responsible:    unassigned
>State:          open
>Class:          sw-bug
>Submitter-Id:   net
>Arrival-Date:   Mon Aug 27 11:26:01 PDT 2001
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator:     Andreas P. Priesnitz
>Release:        3.0.1
>Organization:
Num.&Appl. Math. Goettingen
>Environment:
System: OSF1 u49.num.math.uni-goettingen.de V4.0 1229 alpha
Machine: alpha
host: alphaev67-dec-osf4.0f
build: alphaev67-dec-osf4.0f
target: alphaev67-dec-osf4.0f
configured with: ./configure --disable-version-specific-runtime-libs
>Description:
After:
  % ./configure --disable-version-specific-runtime-libs && make bootstrap
I get:
  ...
  Configuring in alphaev67-dec-osf4.0f/libstdc++-v3
  ...
  checking for --enable-version-specific-runtime-libs... yes
  ...
Libraries are accordingly installed in $(libsubdir) rather than $(libdir).
If the configure option is omitted, I get the correct behaviour that I would
expect for `--disable-...'.
>How-To-Repeat:
>Fix:
Probably a bug in the definition of
  AC_ARG_ENABLE(version-specific-runtime-libs,...)
in
  ./libstdc++-v3/aclocal.m4
but I don't know about m4 programming.
>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted:


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]