This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: c++/3476: wrong `const' behaviour

To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-prs at gcc dot gnu dot org, kunert at physik dot tu-dresden dot de, nobody at gcc dot gnu dot org
Subject: Re: c++/3476: wrong `const' behaviour
From: nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: 29 Jun 2001 13:39:19 -0000

Synopsis: wrong `const' behaviour

State-Changed-From-To: open->closed
State-Changed-By: nathan
State-Changed-When: Fri Jun 29 06:39:19 2001
State-Changed-Why:
    Not a bug. a const object must have an initializer [8.5]/9
    Yeay even though it has no members. You need an '= {}'.
    I think there might be a defect report about that.

http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view&pr=3476&database=gcc

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]