This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: g++ regression - or not ?

To: "Artem Khodush" <artem at duma dot gov dot ru>
Subject: Re: g++ regression - or not ?
From: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>
Date: 04 Jun 2001 16:21:34 -0300
Cc: "Dirk Mueller" <dmuell at gmx dot net>, <gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Organization: GCC Team, Red Hat
References: <20010603002006.A11757@rotes20.wohnheim.uni-kl.de><007701c0ecc8$75e17ca0$545a9090@duma.gov.ru>

On Jun  4, 2001, "Artem Khodush" <artem@duma.gov.ru> wrote:

>> price question: do you think Foo::bar() will be called, or not ?

> This appears to be not a regression, since according to the standard, 
> Foo::bar() indeed should be called: 

On the contrary: it is a progression.  It is called now, as mandated
by the standard, whereas it wouldn't be called in earlier versions.

-- 
Alexandre Oliva   Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer                  aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp        oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist    *Please* write to mailing lists, not to me

Follow-Ups:
- Re: g++ regression - or not ?
  - From: Dirk Mueller

References:
- g++ regression - or not ?
  - From: Dirk Mueller
- Re: g++ regression - or not ?
  - From: Artem Khodush

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]