This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: other/2857: i18n, translations does not work

>>>>> "Zack" == Zack Weinberg <zackw@Stanford.EDU> writes:

    Zack> A translation is something that could easily get added in a
    Zack> 3.0.x patch release, if it isn't ready in time for 3.0.0, so
    Zack> don't feel pressured.  I think that independent of this the
    Zack> machinery should work in 3.0.0.

Just to emphasize both of these points: adding translations is
something that I think would be perfect for a .x release.  There is no
risk to anyone not using the translation, and the only real risk to
those using the translation is of wrong messages, not wrong code
generation.

I'd be much more nervous about reworking diagnostic.c for the
dot-release, so we should do that now, if we can.

My goal is for the dot releases to contain sufficiently minor tweaks
that it will be easy to have high confidence.

--
Mark Mitchell                   mark@codesourcery.com
CodeSourcery, LLC               http://www.codesourcery.com
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]