This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: gcc -x bug in 2.95.3
Thank you for the reply.
Huh? I thought gcc was integrated? This is not gcc which make the
assembly? I'm just making some observations: gcc 2.95.2 runs well and
2.95.3 cannot be used. I've only upgraded GCC and I did not see any
notes about losing support for netbsd/m68k on this minor version
upgrade :(
How should I upgrade an assembler for a processor (MC68040) which is
about 10 years old? :)
Any other example which happen only when I'm using gcc 2.95.3 and NOT
with previous releases:
gcc -c -O2 -fPIC -I/usr/local/qt/src/3rdparty/zlib
-I/usr/local/qt/src/3rdparty/libpng -o 3rdparty/libpng/png.o
3rdparty/libpng/png.c
/var/tmp/ccS827na.s: Assembler messages:
/var/tmp/ccS827na.s:689: Error: operands mismatch -- statement `jbsr
_png_free_data,a1' ignored
/var/tmp/ccS827na.s:830: Error: operands mismatch -- statement `jbsr
_png_free_data,a1' ignored
/var/tmp/ccS827na.s:879: Error: operands mismatch -- statement `jbsr
_png_free_data,a1' ignored
*** Error code 1
Anyway, you are a red hat developer, does "porting" make any sense
for you ? ;P~
>On Apr 18, 2001, mbuna@undernet.org wrote:
>
>> res_func.s: Assembler messages:
>> res_func.s:1524: Error: parse error -- statement `fcmpd
>> #:0x41dfffffffc00000,fp0' ignored
>
>Perhaps an assembler update would help?
>
>--
>Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
>Red Hat GCC Developer aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com}
>CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
>Free Software Evangelist *Please* write to mailing lists, not to me
Stephane Thiell