This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: 3.1 bootstrap fails on sparcv9-sun-solaris2.8
- To: Brad Lucier <lucier at math dot purdue dot edu>
- Subject: Re: 3.1 bootstrap fails on sparcv9-sun-solaris2.8
- From: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>
- Date: 09 Apr 2001 02:23:13 -0300
- Cc: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Organization: GCC Team, Red Hat
- References: <200104090502.AAA28797@zakon.math.purdue.edu>
On Apr 9, 2001, Brad Lucier <lucier@math.purdue.edu> wrote:
> Aren't we going about this all the wrong way? I just want to
> build a nice, 32bit, compiler that can happen to generate 64-bit code
> and link to 64-bit libraries when I give the right options. It seems
> to me that this should be possible, or even straightforward.
Oh. Then, sparcv9 is not what you want. That will get you a 64-bit
compiler by default, IIRC.
If you want a 32-bit compiler by default, you'll have to uncomment a
few lines in gcc/config.gcc, right after:
# At the moment, 32-to-64 cross compilation doesn't work.
--
Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist *Please* write to mailing lists, not to me