Re: Problem with g++ in gcc version 3.0 20010402

[Phil Edwards <pedwards at disaster dot jaj dot com>]

On Thu, Apr 05, 2001 at 10:13:32AM -0400, David Ronis wrote:
> ignoring nonexistent directory "/usr/include/g++-"
> ignoring nonexistent directory "/usr/include/g++-/i686-pc-linux-gnu"

Huh.  Those are supposed to be "g++-v3", not "g++-".  And that's where
all the C++ headers would go.


> Ok it seems that the g++ include files are no longer part of the
> default include search path

They are.  Don't bother trying to work around this; something is definitely
broken.


> Sure enough, there is no bits/c++config.h file in
> /usr/include/g++-v3/bits, but there is one in
> /usr/include/g++-v3/i686-pc-linux-gnu/bits/

That's where it's supposed to be.  That directory is also supposed to be
searched by default.

If you build the exact same sources, using the exact same configure
options, but using a different --prefix, does the same problem occur?
Use a brand new (i.e., empty) directory for the choice of --prefix, like
/tmp/this_is_a_test, and see what happens.


Phil

-- 
pedwards at disaster dot jaj dot com  |  pme at sources dot redhat dot com
devphil at several other less interesting addresses in various dot domains
The gods do not protect fools.  Fools are protected by more capable fools.