This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: -pg vs regparm(2) on linux

To: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
Subject: Re: -pg vs regparm(2) on linux
From: Doug Evans <dje at transmeta dot com>
Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2001 01:43:39 -0800 (PST)
Cc: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
References: <200103242250.OAA30420@casey.transmeta.com><20010325013011.A7898@redhat.com>

Richard Henderson writes:
 > On Sat, Mar 24, 2001 at 02:50:14PM -0800, Doug Evans wrote:
 > > Am I correct in saying -pg and the regparm attribute don't mix
 > > well together (in current sources)?
 > 
 > Yep.  Dont Do That.

If I wanted to, I'm guessing all I need to do is
hack FUNCTION_PROFILER and maybe write my own mcount.
Right?

Where are the sources for linux mcount?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: -pg vs regparm(2) on linux
  - From: Richard Henderson

References:
- -pg vs regparm(2) on linux
  - From: Doug Evans
- Re: -pg vs regparm(2) on linux
  - From: Richard Henderson

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]