This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: gcc-2.95.3 build failure with 2 different binutils

To: Markus Werle <markus at lufmech dot rwth-aachen dot de>
Subject: Re: gcc-2.95.3 build failure with 2 different binutils
From: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>
Date: 22 Mar 2001 07:30:15 -0300
Cc: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
Organization: GCC Team, Red Hat
References: <3AB88A44.A221EB9B@lufmech.rwth-aachen.de><oru24mkbcc.fsf@guarana.lsd.ic.unicamp.br><3AB9D14C.9816DEB1@lufmech.rwth-aachen.de>

On Mar 22, 2001, Markus Werle <markus@lufmech.rwth-aachen.de> wrote:

> I cannot see why gcc should not bootstrap with an existing,
> somewhere else installed, binutils package.

It can.  Please see the FAQ on how to get GCC to find the right as and
ld.

-- 
Alexandre Oliva   Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer                  aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp        oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist    *Please* write to mailing lists, not to me

Follow-Ups:
- Re: gcc-2.95.3 build failure with 2 different binutils
  - From: Markus Werle

References:
- gcc-2.95.3 build failure with 2 different binutils
  - From: Markus Werle
- Re: gcc-2.95.3 build failure with 2 different binutils
  - From: Alexandre Oliva
- Re: gcc-2.95.3 build failure with 2 different binutils
  - From: Markus Werle

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]