This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: gcc-2.95.3 build failure with 2 different binutils
- To: Markus Werle <markus at lufmech dot rwth-aachen dot de>
- Subject: Re: gcc-2.95.3 build failure with 2 different binutils
- From: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>
- Date: 21 Mar 2001 19:26:27 -0300
- Cc: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Organization: GCC Team, Red Hat
- References: <3AB88A44.A221EB9B@lufmech.rwth-aachen.de>
On Mar 21, 2001, Markus Werle <markus@lufmech.rwth-aachen.de> wrote:
> I used binutils-binutils-2.10.1 and binutils-200010321
> I built binutils first, put them in the PATH, configured/bootstrapped
So why is it that you didn't follow the very documentation you're
complaining about, that suggests using the same prefix for both
packages. Having binutils/bin in your PATH just won't help. This is
even covered in the FAQ.
--
Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist *Please* write to mailing lists, not to me