This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: If you don't have a previous incarnation of GCJ installed...
- To: Bryce McKinlay <bryce at albatross dot co dot nz>
- Subject: Re: If you don't have a previous incarnation of GCJ installed...
- From: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>
- Date: 10 Mar 2001 02:59:41 -0300
- Cc: Zack Weinberg <zackw at stanford dot edu>, java at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org, libtool at gnu dot org
- Organization: GCC Team, Red Hat
- References: <20010309012240.B386@stanford.edu><3AA9631E.76A43EF5@albatross.co.nz>
On Mar 9, 2001, Bryce McKinlay <bryce@albatross.co.nz> wrote:
> My preferred solution is for libtool to stop doing silly tests!
Agreed.
> (there has never been a GCJ that doesn't support "-c -o"), but don't
> think Oliva liked that idea. Ideally we could put a flag in
> ltcf-gcj.sh that tells it not to bother, but I don't see an obvious
> way to do that with the current libtool.
I suggest enclosing the `-c -o' test in an (expanded shell version of)
AC_CACHE_CHECK, like most other tests, and setting the cache variable
in ltcf-gcj.sh. I was hoping to get to it tonight, but I'm too tired.
If nobody beats me to it (hint, hint :-), I'll (hopefully) give it a
try tomorrow.
--
Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist *Please* write to mailing lists, not to me