This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Java broken after i386 PIC change

To: Bryce McKinlay <bryce at albatross dot co dot nz>
Subject: Re: Java broken after i386 PIC change
From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2001 21:46:47 -0800
Cc: apbianco at cygnus dot com, gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org, martin dot kahlert at infineon dot com, java-discuss at sourceware dot cygnus dot com
References: <20010116123822.A16053@keksy.muc.infineon.com> <3A6675A9.745842BC@albatross.co.nz> <14950.34116.664233.394672@deliverance.cygnus.com> <3A66CD61.9E2D7772@albatross.co.nz> <20010120181423.A4865@redhat.com> <3A6A5F36.81CD863D@albatross.co.nz> <20010120201908.A5004@redhat.com> <3A6A6DB9.2BE0997E@albatross.co.nz>

On Sun, Jan 21, 2001 at 06:03:53PM +1300, Bryce McKinlay wrote:
> 2.9.5.0.22-6, but I'm pretty sure I got the same thing the other day
> on an RH7 box with 2.10.0.18-1. Will check.

Please do.  That you recall it failing is the most singularly
confusing piece of evidence.

> > Would you send me objdump -h of the failing
> > executable?
> 
> Attached.

Bother.  Nothing informative there; everything is as it ought.
I suppose I'll see if I can find a rh62 box and try there...

r~

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Java broken after i386 PIC change
  - From: Per Bothner
- Re: Java broken after i386 PIC change
  - From: Bryce McKinlay

References:
- Java broken after i386 PIC change
  - From: Bryce McKinlay
- Re: Java broken after i386 PIC change
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: Java broken after i386 PIC change
  - From: Bryce McKinlay
- Re: Java broken after i386 PIC change
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: Java broken after i386 PIC change
  - From: Bryce McKinlay

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]