This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: libtool vs gcj
- To: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
- Subject: Re: libtool vs gcj
- From: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>
- Date: 16 Jan 2001 20:26:57 -0200
- Cc: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Organization: GCC Team, Red Hat
- References: <20010115171334.A26784@redhat.com>
On Jan 15, 2001, Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com> wrote:
> This appears to be caused by the generated libtool script having
> "compiler_c_o=no" in the gcj section. This appears to be due to
> trying to compile C with a Java compiler, noticing that it doesn't
> work, and deciding that that means that -o is not supported.
> Suggestions?
Odd. It seems to be set up to use $lt_simple_compile_test_code in the
compiler_c_o test, and ltcf-gcj.sh sets it to `class foo {}', which
should be ok.
I'm re-enabling the Java libraries in my x86 build tree to see what's
going on.
--
Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist *Please* write to mailing lists, not to me