This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Bug in g++ --syntax-only

To: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
Subject: Re: Bug in g++ --syntax-only
From: Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>
Date: 16 Jan 2001 09:24:36 +0000
Cc: Phil Edwards <pedwards at disaster dot jaj dot com>, Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>, Gcc Bug List <bug-gcc at gnu dot org>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
References: <873deo1hn7.fsf@creche.redhat.com><20010116002459.A32456@disaster.jaj.com><20010115215546.C27073@redhat.com>

>>>>> "Richard" == Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com> writes:

> On Tue, Jan 16, 2001 at 12:24:59AM -0500, Phil Edwards wrote:
>> > I think addition of those -l flags should be disabled when
>> > --syntax-only is given.  I find these messages counterintuitive.
>> 
>> Same here.  Somebody comment on the below patch?

> Ok.

No, not OK.  Please fix this in g++spec.c instead (search for 'warning').

Jason

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Bug in g++ --syntax-only
  - From: Phil Edwards

References:
- Bug in g++ --syntax-only
  - From: Tom Tromey
- Re: Bug in g++ --syntax-only
  - From: Phil Edwards
- Re: Bug in g++ --syntax-only
  - From: Richard Henderson

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]