This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: libio in gcc in CVS is not compatible with glibc 2.2

To: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>
Subject: Re: libio in gcc in CVS is not compatible with glibc 2.2
From: Ulrich Drepper <drepper at redhat dot com>
Date: 18 Jul 2000 12:31:29 -0700
Cc: "H . J . Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>, gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
References: <20000717235020.A29373@lucon.org> <orbszvgxoq.fsf@guarana.lsd.ic.unicamp.br> <m3g0p75loq.fsf@otr.mynet.cygnus.com> <or7lajfeu4.fsf@guarana.lsd.ic.unicamp.br> <m3vgy345rb.fsf@otr.mynet.cygnus.com> <orog3vdziu.fsf@guarana.lsd.ic.unicamp.br>
Reply-To: drepper at cygnus dot com (Ulrich Drepper)

Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@redhat.com> writes:

> Wouldn't changing the declaration and the definitio of _IO_seekoff
> in GCC's libio break builds with older releases of glibc?

No.  You might get a warning but probably not even that.

-- 
---------------.                          ,-.   1325 Chesapeake Terrace
Ulrich Drepper  \    ,-------------------'   \  Sunnyvale, CA 94089 USA
Red Hat          `--' drepper at redhat.com   `------------------------

References:
- libio in gcc in CVS is not compatible with glibc 2.2
  - From: H . J . Lu
- Re: libio in gcc in CVS is not compatible with glibc 2.2
  - From: Alexandre Oliva
- Re: libio in gcc in CVS is not compatible with glibc 2.2
  - From: Ulrich Drepper
- Re: libio in gcc in CVS is not compatible with glibc 2.2
  - From: Alexandre Oliva
- Re: libio in gcc in CVS is not compatible with glibc 2.2
  - From: Ulrich Drepper
- Re: libio in gcc in CVS is not compatible with glibc 2.2
  - From: Alexandre Oliva

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]