This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: g++.law/refs4.C fixed or not?
- To: Richard Henderson <rth at cygnus dot com>
- Subject: Re: g++.law/refs4.C fixed or not?
- From: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at cygnus dot com>
- Date: 30 May 2000 09:59:59 -0300
- Cc: Zack Weinberg <zack at wolery dot cumb dot org>, gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Organization: Cygnus Solutions, a Red Hat Company
- References: <20000529225619.A12945@cygnus.com><20000529230632.B294@wolery.cumb.org><20000529231640.A12977@cygnus.com>
On May 30, 2000, Richard Henderson <rth@cygnus.com> wrote:
> On Mon, May 29, 2000 at 11:06:32PM -0700, Zack Weinberg wrote:
>> > + * g++.law/refs4.C: Remove XFAIL.
>> >
>> > For what you remove XFAIL?
>>
>> It works for me (tm). Maybe it should be xfail just on powerpc.
> Which makes me wonder if it was in fact _fixed_ on x86,
> or if it just randomly stopped failing. Anyone know?
It used to just print FAIL, instead of abort()ing, so we didn't detect
the failure. I adjusted it so as to abort(), then marked it as
XFAIL. It actually failed on at least alphaev6-unknown-linux-gnu,
mn10300-elf and powerpc-eabi (or whatever target triplet the GCC
regression tester uses). I think it also failed on x86, but I don't
have a copy of my last run of the testsuite.
--
Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guaranį, see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Cygnus Solutions, a Red Hat company aoliva@{redhat, cygnus}.com
Free Software Developer and Evangelist CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp
oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org} Write to mailing lists, not to me