This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: [patch] Re: Bootstrap make -- tries to compile c++ too soon

To: Richard Henderson <rth at cygnus dot com>
Subject: Re: [patch] Re: Bootstrap make -- tries to compile c++ too soon
From: Zack Weinberg <zack at wolery dot cumb dot org>
Date: Fri, 26 May 2000 18:58:52 -0700
Cc: Donn Terry <donnte at microsoft dot com>, gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, hjl at gnu dot org
References: <309F4FC4705DC844987051A517E9E39B16EEF7@red-pt-02.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> <20000526172418.A25210@wolery.cumb.org> <20000526183001.A30886@cygnus.com>

On Fri, May 26, 2000 at 06:30:01PM -0700, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On Fri, May 26, 2000 at 05:24:18PM -0700, Zack Weinberg wrote:
> > The _proper_ fix, IMHO, is to make libgcc.a, or actually libgcc2.ready, 
> > depend directly on $(LANGUAGES) as well as $(GCC_PASSES).
> 
> Agreed.  I'd noticed that problem and fixed it in my local
> tree a week or two ago, and then misplaced the change and
> forgot about it.

Well, don't apply the patch I sent in; libgcc.mk really does need to
depend on xgcc.  I missed the use of $(GCC_FOR_TARGET) in the
envariable list.

Just putting that back got me through a -j2 bootstrap, on a
single-processor machine.

zw

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch] Re: Bootstrap make -- tries to compile c++ too soon
  - From: Gerald Pfeifer

References:
- Bootstrap make -- tries to compile c++ too soon
  - From: Donn Terry
- [patch] Re: Bootstrap make -- tries to compile c++ too soon
  - From: Zack Weinberg
- Re: [patch] Re: Bootstrap make -- tries to compile c++ too soon
  - From: Richard Henderson

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]