Re: gnu.linkonce too aggressive

["Martin v. Loewis" <martin at loewis dot home dot cs dot tu-berlin dot de>]

> Shouldn't the file name from where the function was taken be included
> in the section name instead of "gnu.linkonce" ?

Thanks for your bug report. This is not a bug in the compiler; it is a
bug in your code: there are no static classes in C++. Instead, you are
declaring qq and ww as static variables.

As a result, you have two definitions for A::A(), thus violating the
one definition rule. As such violation does not require a diagnostic
by the compiler, your program has undefined behaviour.

Instead of static classes, you should use unnamed namespaces.

Regards,
Martin