This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
GCC 2.95.2 Build problem
- To: "'gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org'" <gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Subject: GCC 2.95.2 Build problem
- From: Brandon Warhurst <bwarhurst at dsrnet dot com>
- Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2000 14:22:18 -0500
- Organization: Digital System Resources, Inc.
GCC version: 2.95.2
Platform: hppa1.1-hp-hpux11.00
Compiler options: none (compiler won't build)
Source files: none (compiler won't build)
The problem is the following:
After compiling the first stage of gcc (stage1/xgcc) the following command
is executed:
/usr/local/hppa1.1-hp-hpux11.00/bin/nm /usr/lib/libc.2
(I don't know all the options passed to nm because make doesn't display
them).
This returns the result: Bad value
When I execute the nm command myself, it also returns Bad value on that
file. Eventually
this "goes away" meaning that after several minutes, I can execute the nm
command myself
and it appears to work.
Upon executing make for a second time I eventually run into trouble with
some of the
symbols such as __main. Apparently they are "undefined" even though I saw
them all
get processed earlier during the make. However, upon running the make for
the third time,
things process past this point and then it finally dies upon being unable
to find cpp. I looked
for cpp everywhere and it didn't seem to be located anywhere.
Note also that I am using "make bootstrap"
Now I have checked the list of systems gcc was compiled under. This
combination wasn't
one of them. So I am assuming it wasn't tested. Even so, does anyone have
any ideas as
to how to solve these problems? I am also assuming that the first error
may have cascaded into the other two errors because something wasn't done.
But I don't know that for sure.
Brandon Warhurst
Digital System Resources, Inc.
bpw@dsrnet.com