This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: grokfield miscompiled with -O9

To: zack at wolery dot cumb dot org
Subject: Re: grokfield miscompiled with -O9
From: "Martin v. Loewis" <martin at loewis dot home dot cs dot tu-berlin dot de>
Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2000 20:50:45 +0100
CC: rth at cygnus dot com, oliva at lsd dot ic dot unicamp dot br, gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
References: <200001060411.XAA24509@onsager.chem.mcgill.ca> <orr9fup2ik.fsf@benta.lsd.ic.unicamp.br> <20000107102904.A1646@cygnus.com> <200001081846.TAA23474@loewis.home.cs.tu-berlin.de> <20000108113425.A11567@wolery.cumb.org>

> I wonder if this isn't the same bug as execute/991112-1.c.  That one has
> to do with -O3 and not clearing an entire register, too.

That could well be. Another commonality is that removing the unused,
unrelated function corrects the code...

Regards,
Martin

Follow-Ups:
- Re: grokfield miscompiled with -O9
  - From: Alexandre Oliva

References:
- Re: ICE in optimized build of 20000103
  - From: David Ronis
- Re: ICE in optimized build of 20000103
  - From: Alexandre Oliva
- Re: ICE in optimized build of 20000103
  - From: Richard Henderson
- grokfield miscompiled with -O9
  - From: Martin v. Loewis
- Re: grokfield miscompiled with -O9
  - From: Zack Weinberg

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]