Re: 2.95.1 and .2 configure bug on solaris

[Nils Lohner <lohner at hew dot ecf dot teradyne dot com>]

In message <200001042145.WAA00837@loewis.home.cs.tu-berlin.de>, "Martin v. 
Loew
is" writes:
>> I've seen this problem in these two releases, and some before that as well. 
> 
>I haven't seen this before, even though I've installed gcc on Solaris
>a number of times. Is there something modified in your build environment?
>

What could be modified?  Can you give me some examples on where to look?  
Most things shoudl be GNU tools, shells are the only thing I can think of.  
I have a /sup tree where all my hand build binaries (including compilers, 
etc.) go, all compiled with --prefix=/sup and that should be first in all 
paths and seems to be propeorly detected by config scripts as well.



>> If there's anything I can do to narrow it down, let me know.
>
>You can put a 'set -x' in the configure script(s), to see the shell
>commands as they are executed in order.
>
  Which configure scripts in particular?  I just tried recompiling binutils 
2.9.1 (to go after the libgcc problem) and also saw the same thing, funnily 
enough...

Nils.