This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: type control of builtins; `&var;'


> About `&var;'.  As you can see from my msg of 23.10, I did not use
> C++.  It was C, and statement in question was like `&var;' (which
> pattern is in msg subj), where var is a regular automatic one.

My original comment still holds: If the address of some data is taken,
the compiler won't do certain optimizations. Look for TREE_ADDRESSABLE
in the gcc sources.

Regards,
Martin


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]