This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: gcc-2.95.1 (Intel) & Stepanov Benchmark failures
- To: hjl at lucon dot org (H.J. Lu)
- Subject: Re: gcc-2.95.1 (Intel) & Stepanov Benchmark failures
- From: Jeffrey A Law <law at cygnus dot com>
- Date: Tue, 19 Oct 1999 02:03:23 -0600
- cc: juergen at monocerus dot demon dot co dot uk, egcs-bugs at egcs dot cygnus dot com
- Reply-To: law at cygnus dot com
In message <19991018135529.ECB681B493@ocean.lucon.org>you write:
> >
> > In message <19991018054303.B8F5E1B493@ocean.lucon.org>you write:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Please try
> > >
> > > http://egcs.cygnus.com/ml/gcc-patches/1999-10/msg00320.html
> > Why don't *YOU* submit the patch in a form that we can use so that we can
> > properly evaluate it?
> >
>
> I will give it one more try. Here is a small testcase. Please keep
> in mind that the SVR4 ABI requires structures be returned in memory.
> >From the stack rtl dump, we have
>
[ ... ]
FWIW, I've modified the test you included at the end of your message so
that it triggers the bug and added enough glue around it so that it
will fit into our regression testsuite. Of course, I then added it to the
testsuite. :-)
jeff