This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
#include "iostream"
signature S
{
int value() const;
};
class C
{
int i;
public:
C(int i = 0) : i(i) {}
int value() const
{
return i;
}
int dummy()
{
}
};
int main()
{
S *s = new C(10);
cout
<< s->value() // <--- line
22 !
<< endl
;
return 0;
}
here is what I obtain :
essai.cc: In function `int main()':
essai.cc:22: Internal compiler error.
essai.cc:22: Please submit a full bug report.
essai.cc:22: See <URL:http://egcs.cygnus.com/faq.html#bugreport>
for instructions.
methinks using `const' after S::value() could not be a misuse, because
if a pointer of "const class C" can only call "C::value() const" and a
pointer of "class C" can both call "C::value() const" and "C::dummy()",
so a pointer of "signature S" should also be both able to call "C::value()
const" and "C::dummy()" !
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |