This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: C++: stl_vector.h:241: sorry, not implemented: `tree_vec' not supported by dump_expr
- To: Gerald Pfeifer <pfeifer at dbai dot tuwien dot ac dot at>
- Subject: Re: C++: stl_vector.h:241: sorry, not implemented: `tree_vec' not supported by dump_expr
- From: Nathan Sidwell <nathan at acm dot org>
- Date: Wed, 29 Sep 1999 16:28:45 +0100
- CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- References: <Pine.GSO.4.10.9909291235140.11896-100000@markab.dbai.tuwien.ac.at>
- Reply-To: nathan at compsci dot bristol dot ac dot uk
Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
>
> This is for some code I may not release and I did not manage to generate
> a small testcase in decent time, but perhaps the messages suffice?
>
> (If not, I'll work even harder to generate a test case.)
>
> Current CVS repository.
>
> /sw/test/gcc/SunOS/lib/gcc-lib/sparc-sun-solaris2.6/2.96/../../../../include/g++-3/stl_vector.h:241:
> sorry, not implemented: `tree_vec' not supported by dump_expr
My patches haven't changed whether dump_expr understands a tree_vec, a prepatched
version has the same case labels. Without a test case I don't know what the tree_vec
is supposed to be...
nathan
--
Dr Nathan Sidwell :: Computer Science Department :: Bristol University
I have seen the death of PhotoShop -- it is called GIMP
nathan@acm.org http://www.cs.bris.ac.uk/~nathan/ nathan@cs.bris.ac.uk