This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: problem with builtin functions

To: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
Subject: Re: problem with builtin functions
From: Jason Merrill <jason at cygnus dot com>
Date: 15 Sep 1999 11:40:23 -0700
Cc: Haj dot Ten dot Brugge at net dot HCC dot nl, egcs-bugs at egcs dot cygnus dot com
References: <199909150658.HAA11592@net.HCC.nl> <19990915110220N.mitchell@codesourcery.com>

>>>>> Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com> writes:

 > Cute.  The problem is that this code should be flagged as erroneous.

I disagree; a user is allowed to use a name from the standard library for a
static definition.  Probably duplicate_decls should just throw away the
builtin if the new decl is static.

Jason

Follow-Ups:
- Re: problem with builtin functions
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: problem with builtin functions
  - From: Mark Mitchell

References:
- problem with builtin functions
  - From: Herman ten Brugge
- Re: problem with builtin functions
  - From: Mark Mitchell

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]