This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the EGCS project.
Re: ftp server issues
- To: Jeffrey A Law <law@cygnus.com>
- Subject: Re: ftp server issues
- From: Kip Macy <kip@lyris.com>
- Date: Thu, 29 Jul 1999 12:50:52 -0700 (PDT)
- cc: egcs-bugs@egcs.cygnus.com
On Thu, 29 Jul 1999, Jeffrey A Law wrote:
> In message <Pine.SOL.4.05.9907291227060.22455-100000@luna>you write:
> > > > ncftp ...egcs/releases/gcc-2.95 > ls -l
> > > > drwxrwsr-x 2 220 65516 1024 Jul 29 1998 .
> > > > drwxrwsr-x 6 220 65516 1024 Jul 28 06:39 ..
> > > > -rw-rw-r-- 1 220 65516 5734825 Jul 29 1998
> > > > gcc-1.1.2-2.95.diff.bz2
> > > No, the dates are fine. the problem in on your side. Let me guess,
> > > ncftp on a linux bux?
> > >
> > > jeff
> > Does ncftp in general handle dates incorrectly on linux?
> There's been one other person that has reported problems of this nature
> (bogus dates). He was using ncftp on a linux box and we were able to
> absolutely
> rule out the date provided by the egcs ftp server. Unfortunately they didn't
> have another non-linux box to do any cross testing with.
>
> Actually I do see that you're using ncftp (I missed that earlier). I would
> recommend you try a couple things.
>
> * Try ncftp from a non-linux machine and see what results you get.
>
> * Try a normal ftp client from the same linux machine your originally used.
>
I tried a normal ftp client and it did not give bogus dates. However, when
I used ncftp to go to go.cygnus.com I got correct dates. Thus it would
appear that it is some sort of interaction between ncftp and the
egcs.cygnus.com machine. Very weird.
-Kip
> Those two tests ought to help bound whether or not the problem is in ncftp or
> something else on your linux box.
> jeff
>
>
>
>
>
>
>