This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: indent 1.10.0 and glibc 2.1.1
Andreas Jaeger <aj@arthur.rhein-neckar.de> writes:
> Now the glibc part. Is there any chance that we can guard our inline
> string functions against such defines? Or do we declare such programs
> as broken?
The latter. Memcpy is a standard function which must be available and
only the system is allowed to define macros shadowing the declaration.
If the program does it it is not ISo C compliant and everything can
happen.
--
---------------. drepper at gnu.org ,-. 1325 Chesapeake Terrace
Ulrich Drepper \ ,-------------------' \ Sunnyvale, CA 94089 USA
Cygnus Solutions `--' drepper at cygnus.com `------------------------