This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: FreeBSD linking against libc_r instead of libc
- To: Mike Stump <mrs at wrs dot com>
- Subject: Re: FreeBSD linking against libc_r instead of libc
- From: <kip at lyris dot com>
- Date: Wed, 2 Jun 1999 18:33:47 -0700 (PDT)
- cc: kthomas at gwdg dot de, egcs-bugs at egcs dot cygnus dot com, law at cygnus dot com, obrien at nuxi dot com
My apologies. When I was having problems compiling on FreeBSD in January
absolutely no responses were made to the messages that I sent to
egcs-bugs. It seems logical to think that the employees of Cygnus have to
prioritize.
Why are you making this statement now as opposed to two weeks ago when I
wrote what I did?
On Wed, 2 Jun 1999, Mike Stump wrote:
> > Date: Wed, 19 May 1999 09:23:36 -0700 (PDT)
> > From: <kip@lyris.com>
>
> > This is not a criticism, but a comment on economic reality: Cygnus
> > has a much stronger vested interest in Linux than in FreeBSD. Cygnus
> > is before all else a commercial entity and thus has to prioritize
> > where its efforts are placed.
>
> Most delay in patch approval has little to do with wether Cygnus
> supports the platform commercially. It has more to do with the
> quality understandibility and size of the patch, wether Jeff has been
> sick for a week, or on vacation, the person submitting it, and other
> such considerations.
>
> I think your statement is unfair and unwarranted.
>
>