This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: new g77 x86 ICE in 19990328
- To: craig at jcb-sc dot com
- Subject: Re: new g77 x86 ICE in 19990328
- From: Jeffrey A Law <law at upchuck dot cygnus dot com>
- Date: Mon, 24 May 1999 09:14:22 -0600
- cc: egcs-bugs at egcs dot cygnus dot com
- Reply-To: law at cygnus dot com
In message <19990524071933.8968.qmail@deer>you write:
> This test case is now in g77.f-torture/compile/19990502-0.f and has
> been discussed (on egcs-bugs, I think) under that name.
>
[ ... ]
> Also, I'm probably going to remove the test case, because I can't
> find any info on where I got it from in my email archives, and don't
> want to put it in a release with the author's permission. I am going
> to try some web searches for the author and the code first, though,
> in case I can get a clear answer (or lead) that way.
>From 19990502-0.f:
C Author: Axel T. Brunger
> Anyway, if you're looking for a back-end bug to squash, fire up gdb
> on f771, set arg to compile the test-case with the indicated options,
> break at lang_init_options, finish it, re-set flag_errno_math to 1,
> then continue.
>
> If it runs to completion, great; if not, the bug (in the back end)
> is still there.
OK.
> IIRC, somebody already investigated it and determined it to be (another?)
> case of %argp somehow creeping in as an (invalid) operand for some
> instruction.
Ah. OK. Then I know what the problem is most likely going to be, but not
a good solution yet.
jeff