Re: Bootstrap fail related to HOST_WIDEST_INT

[Franz Sirl <Franz dot Sirl-kernel at lauterbach dot com>]

Am Wed, 24 Feb 1999 schrieb Jeffrey A Law:
>In message <199902241212.MAA19736@sun52.NIS.cambridge>you write:
>  > > Then you need to debug why. 
>  > > 
>  > > system.h has all the HOST_WIDEST_INT code, it's only a dozen lines or so.
>  > > 
>  > > Is is possible something has defined HOST_WIDEST_INT before system.h has
>  > > been included?  That's the only way I immediately see for that code
>  > > to go wrong.
>  > > 
>  > > jeff
>  > 
>  > You probably need to ensure HOST_BITS_PER_LONGLONG is defined in the 
>  > relevant host fragment.  At least, this was the problem I had on the ARM.
>  > 
>Ah.  Yea, that could definitely lose.  I wonder how many xm files don't
>define HOST_BITS_PER_LONGLONG.
>
>I bet this is the problem.  Franz, if you could take care of the ppc linux
>port I'll make a pass over the rest of the xm files (boy, what fun that'll
>be).

The file in question is rs6000/xm-sysv4.h and has HOST_BITS_PER_LONGLONG
disabled via #if 0. David thought Michael should check why it was disabled.

Franz.