This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: continuing egcs-1.1 problems
- To: David Edelsohn <dje at watson dot ibm dot com>
- Subject: Re: continuing egcs-1.1 problems
- From: Elgin Lee <ehl at funghi dot com>
- Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1998 10:12:20 -0800
- cc: Jeffrey Law <law at cygnus dot com>, Michael Meissner <meissner at cygnus dot com>, Gary Thomas <gdt at linuxppc dot org>, Fred Bacon <bacon at aerodyne dot com>, Franz Sirl <Franz dot Sirl-kernel at lauterbach dot com>, Elgin Lee <ehl at funghi dot com>, Amal Phadke <phadke at kewalo dot eng dot hawaii dot edu>, bacon at mediaone dot net, egcs at cygnus dot com, egcs-bugs at cygnus dot com
>>>>> In <9811110048.AA49418@marc.watson.ibm.com>
>>>>> David Edelsohn <dje@watson.ibm.com> wrote:
> r8 is the fixed template size, so this is testing whether the template was
> assembled with .long directive having the correct meaning to allow at
> least enough space for the two addresses as expected by the compiler
> constructing a trampoline call on the stack. If the template does not
> allow enough space for the compiler, this aborts. The test seems to have
> the correct sense and SHOULD NOT be reversed.
<snip>
David,
That makes sense to me. With the intent of the test now clear to me
(as a self test on the assembly of the .long directives), I agree that
the current test is correct.
--Elgin