This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: [patch] Re: Wrong destruction order of static objects in g++

To: Richard Henderson <rth at cygnus dot com>
Subject: Re: [patch] Re: Wrong destruction order of static objects in g++
From: Alexandre Oliva <oliva at dcc dot unicamp dot br>
Date: 05 Jun 1998 00:09:53 -0300
Cc: Klaus-Georg Adams <Klaus-Georg dot Adams at chemie dot uni-karlsruhe dot de>, egcs-bugs at cygnus dot com, jkanze at otelo dot ibmmail dot com, egcs-patches at cygnus dot com
References: <199806041257.OAA19808@achibm5.chemie.uni-karlsruhe.de> <orsolldl4r.fsf@zecarneiro.lsd.dcc.unicamp.br> <19980604183316.B834@dot.cygnus.com>

Richard Henderson <rth@dot.cygnus.com> writes:

> On Thu, Jun 04, 1998 at 04:25:56PM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>> I don't think so, but it's easy to work around this problem.  Here's a 
>> patch that adds this test case.
> [...]
>> +int main() {}

> Don't forget to exit(0).

There's no need for that in C++.  Falling off main() is equivalent to
returning zero.

-- 
Alexandre Oliva
mailto:oliva@dcc.unicamp.br mailto:aoliva@acm.org
http://www.dcc.unicamp.br/~oliva
Universidade Estadual de Campinas, SP, Brasil

References:
- Wrong destruction order of static objects in g++
  - From: Klaus-Georg Adams
- [patch] Re: Wrong destruction order of static objects in g++
  - From: Alexandre Oliva
- Re: [patch] Re: Wrong destruction order of static objects in g++
  - From: Richard Henderson

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]