This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Patch for better diagnostic (was: Re: Bug in MI?)
On , 9 March 1998, 00:56:41, firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
> >>>>> Manfred Hollstein <email@example.com> writes:
> >> That can't be right; you can't treat error_mark_node like a TREE_LIST.
> > Perhaps, you're wright. But that treatment isn't new due to my patch. I only
> > added the the different error message, the while loop was already there.
> Agreed. The old code didn't recognize that we could get an error_mark_node
> there. Do you mind fixing it?
Oops, do you like _me_ to fix it, or what? I'll take a look, see what I can