This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Patch for better diagnostic (was: Re: Bug in MI?)
>>>>> Manfred Hollstein <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
>> That can't be right; you can't treat error_mark_node like a TREE_LIST.
> Perhaps, you're wright. But that treatment isn't new due to my patch. I only
> added the the different error message, the while loop was already there.
Agreed. The old code didn't recognize that we could get an error_mark_node
there. Do you mind fixing it?