This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Patch for better diagnostic (was: Re: Bug in MI?)


Manfred Hollstein writes:

>> It would be even better if we could list those functions...

> Actually, they are listed (abstract_virtuals_error from cp/typeck2.c):

Ok, I couldn't analyse the code as I should, so I was not sure both
error messages would be presented at once.  In this case, shouldn't we
do a two pass loop, listing real abstract functions, then functions
that need a final overrider?

-- 
Alexandre Oliva
mailto:oliva@dcc.unicamp.br mailto:aoliva@acm.org
http://www.dcc.unicamp.br/~oliva
Universidade Estadual de Campinas, SP, Brasil


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]