This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Patch for better diagnostic (was: Re: Bug in MI?)
Manfred Hollstein writes:
>> It would be even better if we could list those functions...
> Actually, they are listed (abstract_virtuals_error from cp/typeck2.c):
Ok, I couldn't analyse the code as I should, so I was not sure both
error messages would be presented at once. In this case, shouldn't we
do a two pass loop, listing real abstract functions, then functions
that need a final overrider?
Universidade Estadual de Campinas, SP, Brasil