This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: egcs-1.0.1 + bastring + Linux => linker undefined references
- To: M dot Cvjetko_nospam at rt dot e-technik dot euni-erlangen dot de, gnu-g++-bug at prep dot ai dot mit dot edu
- Subject: Re: egcs-1.0.1 + bastring + Linux => linker undefined references
- From: mrs at wrs dot com (Mike Stump)
- Date: Mon, 2 Feb 1998 18:49:01 -0800
- Cc: egcs-bugs at cygnus dot com
> From: Miljenko Cvjetko <cvjetko@rt05.e-technik.uni-erlangen.de>
> Date: 02 Feb 1998 16:33:24 +0100
> Weel I have several questions.
> 1) Arent namespaces implemented in egcs-1.0.1 version?
No, this is a FAQ. From the current FAQ:
Features that are still missing include namespaces and templates as
template arguments.
> 2) Which one of those two compilers (gcc2 and egcs) could
> be considered to be more stable and standard compliant?
They are about the same. Users should probably use the FSF release,
unless they need to use the egcs release, in which case they should
use it, but if that also doesn't suit them, then they should use the
release of the day compiler. :-)
Different users have different needs.