This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: string class (almost there!)



>>>>> "Jason" == Jason Merrill <jason@cygnus.com> writes:

>>>>> Jim Peterson <jspeter@roanoke.infi.net> writes:

    >> I think only the first question really pertains to this mailing
    >> list.  The remaining questions really just demonstrate the
    >> borders of my ignorance in this area.  I would truly appreciate
    >> anyone taking the effort to help me push back these borders
    >> (and, for that matter, also with the issue of why there's a
    >> libstdc++.so.27.2.8 _and_ a libstdc++.so.2.7.2.8 on my system,
    >> what the difference is, and which, if either, I could safely
    >> remove).

    Jason> No libstdc++.so.2.8.0?  You should remove both of them.
    Jason> You're probably getting one of those, which would be why
    Jason> you're having problems.

Not so fast! :-)  Those libstdc++'s may well be provided by the
system, and there may well be binaries linked against them.  For
example, on my RedHat 5.0 system, I have:

/usr/i486-linux-libc5/lib/libstdc++.so.27.1.4

and

/usr/lib/libstdc++.so.2.7.2.8

Both of these came with the distribution, and there are some
executables that require them.

    Jason> Jason

-- 
Mark Mitchell		mmitchell@usa.net
Stanford University	http://www.stanford.edu



Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]