Re: [patch, gfortran] PR48298 DTIO, implement size=

[Jerry DeLisle <jvdelisle at charter dot net>]

On 10/19/2016 01:59 AM, Christophe Lyon wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> On 18 October 2016 at 04:45, Steve Kargl
> <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 06:02:52PM -0700, Jerry DeLisle wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > The attached patch enables the size= specifier in a READ statement to work with
> > > child DTIO procedures. This is accomplished by moving the size_used variable
> > > from the dtp structure to the gfc_unit structure so that the accumulation of
> > > bytes during READ is carried across the procedures via the UNIT.

--- snip ---
> Since this was committed (r241294), I'm seeing regressions on
> arm and aarch64 targets.
>
> The list is a bit long, so it's probably simpler you look at:
> http://people.linaro.org/~christophe.lyon/cross-validation/gcc/trunk/241306/report-build-info.html
> Then click on the red "REGRESSED" in the gfortran column.

--- snip ---

The patch changes nothing related to any particular target. If I were to hazard 
a guess I would think the tests are linking against a wrong version of the 
library, the follow on patch (not yet committed) is bumping the libgfortran 
major version number.

I do not have access to a target machine unless there is a way to remote in.  Is 
there one in the gcc compile farm?

Jerry