This is the mail archive of the fortran@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On 10/16/2016 02:15 AM, Dominique d'Humières wrote:
Dear Jerry, The new test fails unless I replace 64 with 16 in 'if (rl.ne.64) call abort’. This seems consistent with your comment
Yes, this is the before patch behavior, we were ignoring the IOLENGTH.
The language seems a little obscure. I think the first sentence means don't expect inquire to use a UDDTIO procedure and the second sentence says when you use a derived type that has UDDTIO procedures in the output list, treat them as if they don't and use the default derived type lengths.The end of the line inquire(iolength=rl) rl, kl, chairman, rl, chairman, t; looks suspicious. Should nit be inquire(iolength=rl) rl, kl, chairman, rl, chairman, tl ?
Your correction is correct, I would have caught the typo had I used IMPLICIT NONE, which I usually do.
I will commit a little later today. Jerry
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |