Re: gfortran-dg-runtest, torture options

[Thomas Schwinge <thomas at codesourcery dot com>]

Hi!

On Thu, 3 Jul 2014 12:58:32 +0200, Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 03, 2014 at 12:54:32PM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> > Thanks Janis and Mikael for your replies (nearly a year ago...), but
> > still my questions remain to be answered: in my understanding, the
> > libgomp testsuite is not the place for compiler torture testing
> > (different optimization flags and all that -- and, that is done for
> > Fortran only; gfortran-dg-runtest), but rather, I understand the libgomp
> > testsuite to be the place for libgomp library testing ;-), and hence I
> > propose to remove that special casing of Fortran test cases:
> 
> No, it is intentional that we torture test those, libgomp is the place
> for all OpenMP runtime tests, not just for library testing.

But then, the obvious question: why for Fortran only, but not for C and
C++?


GrÃÃe,
 Thomas

Attachment: pgpQRpUL7fIh7.pgp
Description: PGP signature