This is the mail archive of the fortran@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Hi all, here is a simple patch for a rejects-valid problem with deferred type-bound procedures. This is the patch from comment 5 in the PR. A simpler (but equivalent) patch can be found in comment 4. Both fix the problem and are free of testsuite regressions. Is any of the two versions still ok for 4.8? Or should it wait for 4.9? Cheers, Janus 2013-01-18 Janus Weil <janus@gcc.gnu.org> PR fortran/46952 * resolve.c (resolve_call): Do not check deferred procedures for recursiveness. 2013-01-18 Janus Weil <janus@gcc.gnu.org> PR fortran/46952 * gfortran.dg/typebound_deferred_1.f90: New.
Attachment:
pr46952_v2.diff
Description: Binary data
Attachment:
typebound_deferred_1.f90
Description: Binary data
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |