This is the mail archive of the fortran@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.
Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
January 31, 2013
| 21:09 | Re: Efficiency of different ways representing temporary arrays for derived types | Thomas Koenig |
| 15:02 | Re: Output in Fortran | Tim Prince |
| 14:23 | Re: Output in Fortran | Anton Shterenlikht |
| 14:15 | Re: Output in Fortran | Arjen Markus |
| 13:40 | Output in Fortran | mp22222222222 |
January 30, 2013
| 17:16 | Re: coarrays? | Jorge D'Elia |
| 16:48 | Re: [Patch, Fortran] PR54339 - Update gfortran.texi's standard refs, status and TS29113 sections | Dominique Dhumieres |
| 16:11 | Re: [Patch, Fortran] PR54339 - Update gfortran.texi's standard refs, status and TS29113 sections | Tobias Burnus |
| 16:07 | Re: [Patch, Fortran] PR54339 - Update gfortran.texi's standard refs, status and TS29113 sections | Dominique Dhumieres |
| 16:02 | [Patch, Fortran] PR54339 - Update gfortran.texi's standard refs, status and TS29113 sections | Tobias Burnus |
| 15:05 | Re: coarrays? | Damian Rouson |
| 10:52 | Re: Co-arrays? | N.M. Maclaren |
| 06:30 | Re: [Patch, Fortran] PR56138 - fix deferred-length character funcs w/o result variable | Paul Richard Thomas |
January 29, 2013
| 22:36 | [Patch, Fortran] PR56138 - fix deferred-length character funcs w/o result variable | Tobias Burnus |
| 22:09 | Re: Co-arrays? | John Chludzinski |
| 22:03 | Re: Co-arrays? | Tobias Burnus |
| 21:43 | Re: [Patch, Fortran] PR 54107: [4.8 Regression] Memory hog with abstract interface | Janus Weil |
| 21:15 | Efficiency of different ways representing temporary arrays for derived types | Harald Anlauf |
| 20:38 | Co-arrays? | John Chludzinski |
| 19:19 | Re: Support for submodules ? | Tobias Burnus |
| 18:31 | Re: Support for submodules ? | John Chludzinski |
| 18:05 | Re: Support for submodules ? | Tobias Burnus |
| 17:33 | Support for submodules ? | John Chludzinski |
| 11:59 | Re: Varying length character strings by John Reid | N.M. Maclaren |
| 11:32 | Re: Varying length character strings by John Reid | John Chludzinski |
| 08:37 | Re: Varying length character strings by John Reid | Tobias Burnus |
| 08:00 | Varying length character strings by John Reid | John Chludzinski |
January 28, 2013
January 27, 2013
| 21:03 | Re: [Patch, Fortran] PR 54107: [4.8 Regression] Memory hog with abstract interface | Janus Weil |
| 20:39 | Re: [Patch, Fortran] PR 54107: [4.8 Regression] Memory hog with abstract interface | Thomas Koenig |
| 20:16 | Re: [Patch, Fortran] PR 54107: [4.8 Regression] Memory hog with abstract interface | Mikael Morin |
| 20:04 | Re: [patch, fortran] Fix PR 50627 | Dominique Dhumieres |
| 19:44 | Re: [patch, fortran] Fix PR 50627 | Thomas Koenig |
| 18:49 | [Patch, Fortran] PR 54107: [4.8 Regression] Memory hog with abstract interface | Janus Weil |
| 18:36 | [patch, fortran] Fix PR 50627 | Thomas Koenig |
| 14:55 | Re: [Patch, fortran] PR53537 Explicit import of USE renamed symbol. | Paul Richard Thomas |
| 07:10 | Re: [Patch, fortran] PR55984 [4.8 Regression] [OOP] ICE: gfc_trans_code(): Bad statement code & PR56047 [4.8 Regression] | Paul Richard Thomas |
January 26, 2013
January 24, 2013
| 21:46 | [committed] Add MIPS option to bind_c_array_params_2.f90 | Richard Sandiford |
| 20:04 | Re: PR55789 - [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Needless realloc with array constructor | Paul Richard Thomas |
January 23, 2013
January 22, 2013
| 22:40 | [Patch, fortran] PR56008 (and PR47517) [F03] wrong code with lhs-realloc on assignment with derived types having allocatable components | Paul Richard Thomas |
| 22:32 | Re: [Patch, libfortran] Improve performance of byte swapped IO | Thomas Koenig |
| 16:38 | [PATCH] Fix up one OpenMP Fortran OOP ICE (PR fortran/56052) | Jakub Jelinek |
| 15:13 | Re: OT: coarray mailing lists? | Steve Kargl |
| 15:06 | Re: gfortran: Why does this fail to compile? | Arjen Markus |
| 15:01 | Re: gfortran: Why does this fail to compile? | Mark Hounschell |
| 15:00 | OT: coarray mailing lists? | Anton Shterenlikht |
| 14:37 | Re: gfortran: Why does this fail to compile? | Arjen Markus |
| 14:30 | Re: gfortran: Why does this fail to compile? | Arjen Markus |
| 14:12 | gfortran: Why does this fail to compile? | Mark Hounschell |
January 21, 2013
| 20:42 | Re: [patch, fortran] Fix PR 55919 | Thomas Koenig |
| 20:12 | GNU Tools Cauldron 2013 - 2nd Call for Abstracts | Diego Novillo |
| 17:05 | Re: [patch, fortran] Fix PR 55919 | Brad Finney |
January 20, 2013
| 22:44 | Re: [patch, fortran] Fix PR 55919 | Steve Kargl |
| 20:04 | Re: [RFA:] fix failing gfortran.dg/inquire_10.f90 for newlib targets | Hans-Peter Nilsson |
| 19:49 | [patch, fortran] Fix PR 55919 | Thomas Koenig |
| 19:14 | Re: [RFA:] fix failing gfortran.dg/inquire_10.f90 for newlib targets | Janne Blomqvist |
| 18:28 | Re: Run gfortran without installing | Tilo Schwarz |
| 18:12 | Re: Run gfortran without installing | Dominique Dhumieres |
| 17:42 | Run gfortran without installing | Tilo Schwarz |
| 16:29 | Re: ICE with openmp | Dominique Dhumieres |
| 15:07 | ICE with openmp | VladimÃr Fuka |
| 12:11 | Re: gfortran 4.8 speed regression? | Thomas Koenig |
| 00:29 | [RFA:] fix failing gfortran.dg/inquire_10.f90 for newlib targets | Hans-Peter Nilsson |
January 19, 2013
| 22:24 | gfortran 4.8 speed regression? | Tilo Schwarz |
| 17:15 | Re: Report failures from make check-fortran? | Dominique Dhumieres |
| 16:38 | Re: Report failures from make check-fortran? | Tilo Schwarz |
| 15:36 | Re: Report failures from make check-fortran? | Dominique Dhumieres |
| 15:11 | Re: Report failures from make check-fortran? | Janus Weil |
| 14:50 | Re: Report failures from make check-fortran? | Janus Weil |
| 14:41 | Report failures from make check-fortran? | Tilo Schwarz |
January 18, 2013
| 23:02 | [Patch, Fortran, OOP] PR 46952: [OOP] Spurious "recursive call" error with type bound procedure | Janus Weil |
| 22:30 | Re: [Patch, libfortran] Improve performance of byte swapped IO | Janne Blomqvist |
January 17, 2013
| 23:32 | Re: [Patch, libfortran] Get rid of "enum try" | Steve Kargl |
| 23:19 | [Patch, libfortran] Get rid of "enum try" | Janne Blomqvist |
| 14:49 | Re: Is this the proper list for getting help with gfortran | Tim Prince |
| 14:25 | Re: Is this the proper list for getting help with gfortran | Mark Hounschell |
| 14:18 | Re: Is this the proper list for getting help with gfortran | Paul Richard Thomas |
| 12:50 | Is this the proper list for getting help with gfortran | Mark Hounschell |
January 16, 2013
January 15, 2013
| 21:47 | Re: testsuite: missing or wrong dg-* directives? | Manfred Schwarb |
| 21:30 | Re: testsuite: missing or wrong dg-* directives? | Manfred Schwarb |
| 21:22 | Re: testsuite: missing or wrong dg-* directives? | Mikael Morin |
| 05:32 | Fwd: [Bug fortran/54286] [4.8 Regression] Accepts invalid proc-pointer assignments involving proc-ptr function result | Paul Richard Thomas |
January 14, 2013
| 22:16 | Re: testsuite: missing or wrong dg-* directives? | Harald Anlauf |
| 21:51 | Re: [patch, Fortran] PR 55806 - Inefficient ANY with array constructors | Thomas Koenig |
| 19:49 | Re: testsuite: missing or wrong dg-* directives? | Mike Stump |
| 14:23 | Re: testsuite: missing or wrong dg-* directives? | Mikael Morin |
| 14:05 | Re: testsuite: missing or wrong dg-* directives? | Mikael Morin |
| 13:29 | Re: [patch, Fortran] PR 55806 - Inefficient ANY with array constructors | Mikael Morin |
| 12:39 | Re: gfortran testsuite failures on 4.6 branch | Janus Weil |
January 13, 2013
January 12, 2013
January 11, 2013
January 10, 2013
January 09, 2013
| 19:29 | Re: [PATCH, testsuite]: Fix scan string of gfortran.dg/intrinsic_size_3.f90 | Tobias Burnus |
| 19:15 | [PATCH, testsuite]: Fix scan string of gfortran.dg/intrinsic_size_3.f90 | Uros Bizjak |
| 17:23 | Re: [Patch, Fortran] PR55758 - Non-C_Bool handling with BIND(C) | Mikael Morin |
| 16:22 | Re: [Patch, Fortran] PR55758 - Non-C_Bool handling with BIND(C) | Tobias Burnus |
| 08:35 | Re: quadmath help | Janus Weil |
| 06:52 | quadmath help | moricciani |
January 08, 2013
| 23:16 | *ping* [patch, Fortran] PR 55806 - Inefficient ANY with array constructors | Thomas Koenig |
| 22:34 | Re: [Patch, Fortran] PR55758 - Non-C_Bool handling with BIND(C) | Tobias Burnus |
| 21:48 | Re: [Patch, fortran] PR47203 Use of module with same name as subroutine | Steve Kargl |
| 21:32 | Re: testsuite: missing or wrong dg-* directives? | Harald Anlauf |
| 21:06 | [Patch, fortran] PR47203 Use of module with same name as subroutine | Mikael Morin |
| 20:07 | Re: [Patch, Fortran] PR55758 - Non-C_Bool handling with BIND(C) | Janne Blomqvist |
| 12:08 | GCC 4.8.0 Status Report (2013-01-08), Stage 3 is over, regression fixes and docs only in effect immediately | Richard Biener |
| 06:29 | Re: [Patch, fortran] PR55618 - [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Failures with ISO_Varying_String test suite | Steve Kargl |
| 06:20 | Re: [Patch, fortran] PR55618 - [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Failures with ISO_Varying_String test suite | Paul Richard Thomas |
| 05:49 | PR 55905: ICE for polymorphic dummy argument with an allocatable coarray component | Damian Rouson |
January 07, 2013
January 06, 2013
January 05, 2013
| 21:26 | Re: "Pinned" allocate | Janne Blomqvist |
| 21:13 | Re: [Patch, libfortran] Improve performance of byte swapped IO | Janne Blomqvist |
| 20:22 | [Patch, fortran] PR fortran/42769 typebound call resolved incorrectly. | Mikael Morin |
| 15:35 | Re: [Patch, libfortran] Improve performance of byte swapped IO | Richard Biener |
| 08:48 | Re: [Patch, Fortran] FINAL (prep patches 4/5): Support noncontiguous arrays in the finalization wrapper function | Paul Richard Thomas |
January 04, 2013
January 03, 2013
| 23:23 | [Patch, Fortran] PR55763 - reject MOLD with NULL() in init-data expressions | Tobias Burnus |
| 21:31 | [Patch, fortran] PR55827 ICE with multiple fortran modules. | Mikael Morin |
| 17:28 | Re: [Patch, fortran] [4.7/4.8 Regression] [OOP] ICE on invalid: gfc_variable_attr(): Bad array reference | Paul Richard Thomas |
| 16:39 | [Patch, Fortran] PR55854/PR55763 - CLASS(*) fixes | Tobias Burnus |
| 14:06 | Re: "Pinned" allocate | Steve Kargl |
| 12:12 | Re: can a pointer to a 4x4 slice of a 5x5 array be CONTIGUOUS? | Tobias Burnus |
| 11:05 | can a pointer to a 4x4 slice of a 5x5 array be CONTIGUOUS? | Sylwester Arabas |
| 10:12 | Re: "Pinned" allocate | Thomas Koenig |
| 09:52 | "Pinned" allocate | Alan Greynolds |
| 06:36 | Re: Incorrect(?) warning | Janus Weil |
| 03:01 | Re: ICE on intent(out) dummy argument with unlimited polymorphic component | Damian Rouson |
| 02:53 | ICE on intent(out) dummy argument with unlimited polymorphic component | Damian Rouson |
| 00:06 | Incorrect(?) warning | Andrew Benson |
January 02, 2013
January 01, 2013
| 20:18 | [patch, Fortran] PR 55806 - Inefficient ANY with array constructors | Thomas Koenig |
Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]