This is the mail archive of the fortran@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [Patch, Fortran] PR 55692: ICE on incorrect use of ASSOCIATED function

From: Janus Weil <janus at gcc dot gnu dot org>
To: Tobias Burnus <burnus at net-b dot de>
Cc: gfortran <fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org>, gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2012 16:17:38 +0100
Subject: Re: [Patch, Fortran] PR 55692: ICE on incorrect use of ASSOCIATED function
References: <CAKwh3qitR-QtBDEMuKg4RJcCeSdZs=58Q3WncSgpfKrL_8ZmeA@mail.gmail.com> <50DDA7D8.40207@net-b.de>

>> here is a close-to-obvious patch for an ICE-on-invalid problem with
>> ASSOCIATED: The relevant checks to catch the error were already there,
>> but were not reached due to a gcc_assert(0) appearing earlier. The
>> patch basically just removes the gcc_assert.
>>
>> Regtested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. Ok for trunk?

Thanks, Tobias. Committed as r194744.

Cheers,
Janus



>> 2012-12-28  Janus Weil  <janus@gcc.gnu.org>
>>
>>      PR fortran/55692
>>      * check.c (gfc_check_associated): Remove a "gcc_assert (0)".
>>
>> 2012-12-28  Janus Weil  <janus@gcc.gnu.org>
>>
>>      PR fortran/55692
>>      * gfortran.dg/associated_7.f90: New.
>
>

References:
- [Patch, Fortran] PR 55692: ICE on incorrect use of ASSOCIATED function
  - From: Janus Weil
- Re: [Patch, Fortran] PR 55692: ICE on incorrect use of ASSOCIATED function
  - From: Tobias Burnus

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]